1. He was able to bring the economy back to in West Germany, get rid of unemployment and even inflation at all timme lows something that had no been done in a while. He was able to successful increase economic prosperity, material wealth, and political stability, according to verdict B. He was also successful because according to Verdict C the people of Germany were worried about going back to the abyss that German was with Hitler in charge. And Adenauer successful helped that from happening.
2. His ignorance towards East Germany. Especially since people felt he refused a great offer by the Soviets to reunite West and East Germany and make them neutral to the Western and Eastern powers. It also appeared that he choose to side with the West when he joined NATO. Verdict E shows criticism that Adenauer he was a puppet to the US in trying to reconstruct West Germany. Which is justifiable because in all aspects he did in fact come together with the US and the West with constructing Germany. Verdict D is justifiable because of the Hallstein Doctrine, that claimed that anything that associated with East Germany didn't exist to West Germany. The reason why it says anything past them is Siberia is because most states towards that way were in fact communist or under communist control which means they had to associate with East Germany.
No comments:
Post a Comment